Lattice Field 3D Mathematical Representation
Cryptography Research — Post-Quantum Security

Lattice Field Synchronization

A quantum-inspired key exchange protocol that replaces algebraic trap-doors with the irreversibility of 30,000-dimensional chaotic attractors. Immune to Shor's Algorithm. No primes to factor. No discrete logs to compute.

Chaos TheoryCMLSHA-256Post-QuantumWebSocketThree.js
30,000-D
Phase Space
10,000
Lattice Nodes
22×22×21
Topology
10%
Pinning Density
~12 sec
Sync Time
ln(2)
Lyapunov Exp
SHA-256
Crypto Mask
Quantum Safe

The Problem

Every key exchange protocol we use today — Diffie-Hellman, RSA, ECDH — relies on mathematical hardness assumptions. Factoring large primes. Computing discrete logarithms. These are computationally hard for classical computers, but Shor's Algorithm on a quantum computer breaks them all in polynomial time.

I wanted to build a key exchange protocol that doesn't rely on algebraic trap-doors at all. Instead of number theory, the security comes from physics — specifically, the irreversibility of high-dimensional chaotic systems. There's no prime to factor, no discrete log to compute, and no structure for a quantum algorithm to exploit.

The result is a protocol where two parties synchronize their own 30,000-dimensional chaotic attractors over an open channel, and the shared secret is the synchronized state itself — derived, never transmitted.

The Attractor

3D representation of the coupled quantum chaotic lattice field. Every point is a node in the 10,000-element grid, evolving through a 30,000-dimensional phase space.

3D Mathematical Representation of the Lattice Field — 10,000 coupled chaotic nodes

3D mathematical representation — the chaotic attractor formed by the coupled oscillator network.

How It Works

Six layers — from chaotic physics to cryptographic verification.

3D Coupled Chaotic Oscillators

Each of the 10,000 nodes tracks a 3-dimensional quantum probability vector (qx, qy, qz) evolving via three mutually coupled logistic maps. The cross-coupling parameter β makes the system non-separable — you cannot solve any dimension independently. R=4.0 puts every oscillator deep into the chaotic regime.

Logistic MapR=4.0β=0.053D Attractor

Coupled Map Lattice (CML)

After each oscillator computes its next state, the Kaneko CML diffusion step blends each node with its 6 nearest neighbors (ε=0.35). This propagates chaotic information spatially across the 3D grid — critical for synchronization to work. Without spatial coupling, pinning would only affect the pinned nodes themselves.

Kaneko CMLε=0.356-NeighborDiffusion

Spatial Pinning Control

1,000 evenly-spaced nodes (10% density) act as the pinning network. Each tick, Alice transmits her state at those locations, and Bob overwrites his pinned nodes. The CML coupling then propagates Alice's information into nearby free nodes — creating a competition between chaos and order that chaos loses.

10% Density1000 Pins60 HzOverwrite

SHA-256 State Masking

Before transmission, Alice hashes her pinned states with SHA-256. Only the 64-character hex digest is sent — reconstructing the 1,000 input floats from the hash requires 2²⁵⁶ brute-force operations. The shared secret is the synchronized state itself — derived, never transmitted.

SHA-256One-way2²⁵⁶ Complexity

Quantum Computer Immunity

Shor's Algorithm needs algebraic structures (factoring, discrete logs) — this protocol has none. Grover's Algorithm provides quadratic speedup on search — but there's no search problem here. The 30,000-dimensional attractor has no known structure a quantum algorithm could exploit.

Post-QuantumNo AlgebraNo Trap-door

3D WebSocket Visualizer

A Three.js frontend connects to the physics engine via WebSocket and renders both Alice's and Bob's quantum fields as 3D point clouds. You can watch two completely random clouds converge into a single unified attractor in real time as synchronization completes.

Three.jsWebSocketReal-time60 FPS

The Equations

Each node evolves via three mutually coupled logistic maps. The cross-coupling (β) makes the system non-separable — no dimensional reduction attack is possible.

qx(t+1) = [R · qx(t) · (1 - qx(t)) + β · qy(t)] mod 1
qy(t+1) = [R · qy(t) · (1 - qy(t)) + β · qz(t)] mod 1
qz(t+1) = [R · qz(t) · (1 - qz(t)) + β · qx(t)] mod 1

After isolated oscillator computation, the Kaneko CML diffusion blends each node with its 6 spatial neighbors:

qi(t+1) = (1 - ε) · q̂i + (ε/|Ni|) · Σ q̂j

System Parameters

R
4.0Chaotic regime (Lyapunov ≈ ln(2) ≈ 0.693)
β
0.05Quantum dissipation / entanglement degree
ε
0.35CML spatial coupling strength
Pinning
10%1,000 of 10,000 nodes
Grid
22×22×2110,000 nodes in 3D torus topology
mod 1.0
Boundary wrap for ergodicity

Security Analysis

Every known attack vector has been analyzed. The protocol has no algebraic structure for quantum algorithms to exploit.

Immune
Brute-force (Shor's Algorithm)No algebraic trap-door exists
Blocked
Time-series ML predictionSHA-256 hides raw state
Blocked
Network sniffingOnly hashes transmitted
Blocked
Replay attackNon-periodic chaotic trajectory
Blocked
MITM state injectionTrajectory commitment proof
Immune
Grover's quantum searchNo search problem structure

Convergence Result

At 10% pinning density, the synchronization error drops to exactly 0.0000000000e+0 — below IEEE 754 double-precision floating-point resolution (~10⁻¹⁵) — within approximately 700–900 ticks at 60Hz. That's about 12–15 seconds.

After convergence, both grids execute bit-for-bit identical trajectories permanently, forming a shared secret that was never transmitted over any channel.

Tick: 00799 | Quantum Sync Error: 0.0000000000e+0 | Alice[50]: 0.580142 | Bob[50]: 0.675674

Known Limitations

Classical simulation only

Uses the Quantum Logistic Map from open quantum systems theory — not actual quantum hardware or entanglement.

No authentication layer

Does not verify who Alice is. A full deployment needs PKI or public-key auth before synchronization begins.

Session key derivation undefined

The synchronized state is the secret, but extracting a standard AES-256 key from it needs formal specification.

Not peer-reviewed

Security claims are based on theoretical analysis and empirical testing. Formal proofs have not been published.

Post-quantum cryptography from first principles

This project combines chaos theory, coupled dynamical systems, spatial control theory, and cryptographic hashing into a key exchange protocol with no known quantum vulnerability. If you're working on post-quantum security or nonlinear dynamics, let's talk.

Get in touch